LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > The Fashionable

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 1,375
0 members and 1,375 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-17-2004, 09:14 PM   #2221
robustpuppy
Moderator
 
robustpuppy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: State of Chaos
Posts: 8,197
RP

Quote:
Originally posted by str8outavannuys
I'll edit it out of my post if you edit it out of yours. Deal?

By the way, more than 50% of my class was on law journal, so it's not like a big freakin deal or anything.
If I wanted to, I could edit all the posts on the subject, but what do I get in the deal? It would have to be something pretty good to risk my mod status (unwritten ethical code, you know), but you can always try.

And what should I have us say instead? In your reply, be sure to include suggestions for this post, and for your response to this post. Then I'll get to work.

Whew! All this thinking about how to rewrite other people's stuff reminds me of law review. Or maybe not.

Last edited by robustpuppy; 02-17-2004 at 09:18 PM..
robustpuppy is offline  
Old 02-17-2004, 09:20 PM   #2222
ThurgreedMarshall
[intentionally omitted]
 
ThurgreedMarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 18,597
Confidential to TM

Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone_Slothrop
Of course it's a complaint about the rules. We don't hate Darth Vader because he blew up Alderan (sp?). We hate him because he epitomizes the evil that is the Empire.
Bad analogy. You hate Darth Vader because he is the evil empire.

Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone_Slothrop
Dickering about a salary cap is symptomatic. The problem is that revenue is more local than national in origin, and there are huge disparities between the localities...You can't solve this problem without transferring a lot of money from rich teams to poor teams, and forcing the latter to pay people more.
I guess it depends on the size of the salary cap. If it was one under which every team could afford to pay to the limit of the cap, your problem is solved. But I see your point. Without revenue sharing, you're never going to come to that number because (1) teams would agree on a number which fell somewhere between the Yankees' and the Pirates' payrolls and (2) players will force the union to push it as close to the Yankees' payroll as possible. The problem is, the players will never agree to a salary cap. And as big a bobble head as Selig is, that ain't his fault.

But even if they instituted revenue sharing and a salary cap that worked, mid-market and small market teams would scream bloody murder when they work their magic and their teams became wildly successful and they have to share that revenue with teams like The Mets in a big market who are underperforming and not so profitable.

I just don't see the problem being solved. Ever.

TM
ThurgreedMarshall is offline  
Old 02-17-2004, 09:23 PM   #2223
dc_chef
Editor Emeritus
 
dc_chef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 543
Quote:
Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
I still haven't seen anyone who'll do better than Clive Owen. He showed he had the stuff in his limited role in "The Bourne Identity."
I didn't see that movie, but Clive Owen did kick ass in the BMW short films.
dc_chef is offline  
Old 02-17-2004, 09:24 PM   #2224
Dave
Might Be Canadian
 
Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Office, door closed.
Posts: 581
Paging Dr. Bunsen Honeydew

Walt Disney Co. said on Tuesday it had agreed to buy the Muppets and "Bear in the Blue House" characters from Jim Henson (news) Co. for undisclosed terms.

Disney, which has flirted for more than a decade with acquiring Kermit the Frog and friends, said it would relaunch the Muppets with new television specials and series.
Dave is offline  
Old 02-17-2004, 09:28 PM   #2225
dc_chef
Editor Emeritus
 
dc_chef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 543
Confidential to TM

Quote:
Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
If it were a complaint about the rules it wouldn't be so bad. But it's not. It's a complaint about the Yankees over and over again for being successful within those rules. Instead of people calling for a salary cap, which would make sense (and I am in full support of), they say, "Tax the Yankees!" The Yankees represent all that is evil. No. The owners (probably even Steinbrenner) would be all for a salary cap. It's because of the union that it will never happen.

And someone needs to beat the shit out of Ben Affleck. People from Boston should be ashamed that they run to that dumbass whenever the Red Sox get fucked.

TM
What I don't understand is why the Red Sox haven't gone full bore to build up. They take some good steps, but haven't gone all out. Why didn't the Red Sox throw tons of money at Joe Torre when he was expressing negative feelings towards the Yankees? Why didn't the Red Sox up the ante for A-Rod?

Steinbrenner may be a dick, but the guy has learned how to run a ball club. He does have it pretty good, with the largest tv revenues available, but even so, he know that he has to spend money, and that if he does, his team will always be in the running for a World Series title.

If there were ever a salary cap, baseball would end up like football -- constant shifts in terms of which teams are the best. (Sure, you'd have some teams that do pretty well year after year, if you have a star player or three, but overall, you know what I mean.)

-- dc (like I know what I'm talking about) chef
dc_chef is offline  
Old 02-17-2004, 09:28 PM   #2226
robustpuppy
Moderator
 
robustpuppy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: State of Chaos
Posts: 8,197
Bond

Quote:
Originally posted by Fugee
I adore Colin Firth, but he's really more Mr. Darcy than 007. If you mean Colin Farrell, bite your tongue.
I agree on Firth. I don't want to see my Mr. Darcy having casual sex with a succession of bimbos (whether helpless or devious) in a film, and I daresay (I just had to use that word here) I'm not alone.
robustpuppy is offline  
Old 02-17-2004, 09:29 PM   #2227
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,147
Confidential to TM

Quote:
Originally posted by Fugee
I'm no sports genius but it makes sense to this small market fan. ARod's annual pay under his Rangers contract was larger than the entire Twins payroll the last year or so. A little revenue sharing would change the playing field.
around 1940 or 50 there was a play and eventually a movie called "damn Yankees" about how the Yankees were too dominating. They didn't ruin baseball then.
What has ruined it is expansion of the number of teams beyond the talent pool. Back when there were fewer teams every team had a chance to have decent players at every position. now the Yanks ability to make sure they do just highlights the fact that most teams can't. What needs to happen isn't caps or other shit that doesn't work anyway (see LA LAKERS), what needs to happen is a bunch of teams should fold- then most remaining teams will at least have the chance to imagine they could be competitive instead of realizing in Feb. they ain't gotta chance.

otherwise, as i said we all become the Washington Generals.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
Old 02-17-2004, 09:30 PM   #2228
str8outavannuys
I am beyond a rank!
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Glasgow, natch.
Posts: 2,807
RP

Quote:
Originally posted by robustpuppy
If I wanted to, I could edit all the posts on the subject, but what do I get in the deal? It would have to be something pretty good to risk my mod status (unwritten ethical code, you know), but you can always try.

And what should I have us say instead? In your reply, be sure to include suggestions for this post, and for your response to this post. Then I'll get to work.

Whew! All this thinking about how to rewrite other people's stuff reminds me of law review. Or maybe not.
Mod, please.
str8outavannuys is offline  
Old 02-17-2004, 09:31 PM   #2229
dc_chef
Editor Emeritus
 
dc_chef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 543
Obscure Reality TV

Quote:
Originally posted by LessinSF
Can't say I was sorry to see Trishelle leave. She had proven herself to be a clueless psycho
But hot as hell. And she's posed nude. And she's dirty. What else do you need?
dc_chef is offline  
Old 02-17-2004, 09:35 PM   #2230
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,147
RP

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by robustpuppy
If I wanted to, I could edit all the posts on the subject, but what do I get in the deal? It would have to be something pretty good to risk my mod status (unwritten ethical code, you know), but you can always try.

And what should I have us say instead? In your reply, be sure to include suggestions for this post, and for your response to this post. Then I'll get to work.

Whew! All this thinking about how to rewrite other people's stuff reminds me of law review. Or maybe not.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Quote:
Originally posted by str8outavannuys
Mod, please.
I went to a vocational law school. what should be more impressive Law journal or Law review? What were your respective LSAT'S?
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
Old 02-17-2004, 09:37 PM   #2231
dc_chef
Editor Emeritus
 
dc_chef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 543
tongue in chic

Quote:
Originally posted by ThrashersFan
Just in case anyone forgot, I like to "do the nasty" while watching my sports so my husband is always pleased when my sports overlap.
What's that old joke about doing it doggy style so that both people can watch the hockey game?
dc_chef is offline  
Old 02-17-2004, 09:38 PM   #2232
ThurgreedMarshall
[intentionally omitted]
 
ThurgreedMarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 18,597
Confidential to TM

Quote:
Originally posted by Fugee
I'm no sports genius but it makes sense to this small market fan. ARod's annual pay under his Rangers contract was larger than the entire Twins payroll the last year or so.
You're no math genius either because there is no way A Rod made $55 million last year.

TM
ThurgreedMarshall is offline  
Old 02-17-2004, 09:40 PM   #2233
robustpuppy
Moderator
 
robustpuppy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: State of Chaos
Posts: 8,197
RP

Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
I went to a vocational law school. what should be more impressive Law journal or Law review? What were your respective LSAT'S?
Hank, please. The only impressive accomplishment on my CV is that I'm 1/3 FB mod.
robustpuppy is offline  
Old 02-17-2004, 09:40 PM   #2234
tmdiva
Quality not quantity
 
tmdiva's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Stumptown, USA
Posts: 1,344
Obscure Reality TV

Quote:
Originally posted by dc_chef
But hot as hell. And she's posed nude. And she's dirty. What else do you need?
What exactly is it that makes Trishelle hot? I just don't see it. She has a really short face, plus under-chin fat. Granted, she has big boobs, but also a classic apple body shape with no waist and spindly arms and legs.

And speaking of gay or homophobic (a la RW Colin), anyone else get an off-the-chart gaydar reading on this woman (Laurie Letourneau, leading the anti-gay-marriage troops in Massachusetts):



tm
tmdiva is offline  
Old 02-17-2004, 09:43 PM   #2235
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,147
Obscure Reality TV

Quote:
Originally posted by tmdiva

And speaking of gay or homophobic (a la RW Colin), anyone else get an off-the-chart gaydar reading on this woman (Laurie Letourneau, leading the anti-gay-marriage troops in Massachusetts):



tm
IXNAY ATTHA ISA ATTICUS'S OMMA
Hank Chinaski is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:36 PM.