LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 2,014
0 members and 2,014 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 02-19-2004, 05:21 PM   #11
sgtclub
Serenity Now
 
sgtclub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Survivor Island
Posts: 7,007
wisconsin

Quote:
Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Because my response was exactly that, so what. You have to demonstrate that hurting profitability is a bad thing for US society. It is possible, see Viscusi et al., to over protect. And it's my contention, admittedly without support, that we overspend on healthcare and therefore create incentives for overinvestment in health care R&D. So, if you lower the profits drug cos. make, just possibly you're reducing the amount of R&D to the socially optimal level.
I now understand your point. You are saying that R&D costs are too high because of the monopoly pricing, or in other words, that there is a lot of fluff in R&D because of the monopoly pricing. This raises a very important philosophical point that gets at the heart of the issue - who is to decide how much R&D/profit is too much? I am far more comfortable with each enterprise making that determination based on market incentives that the decision be regulated by the government.
sgtclub is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:14 PM.