LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 1,393
0 members and 1,393 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 02-19-2004, 05:50 PM   #11
sgtclub
Serenity Now
 
sgtclub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Survivor Island
Posts: 7,007
wisconsin

Quote:
Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
I am too, but drug companies aren't facing true "market" incentives right now, so to say that changing the current regulation is pareto inferior is not a forgone conclusion.

I don't think it would be too unreasonable , if one has a national Rx drug plan, to offer a price that is equal to an exchange-rate adjusted average price in the 7 largest industrial countries other than the US.
You may be right for particular drugs made by particular companies, but to say drug companies in general are not facing true markets is ridiculous, and even for those drugs where they have a monopoly, you have not shown evidence of predatory pricing (I am not convinced that because they charge less in Canada they are engaged in predatory pricing in the States).

Setting aside my discomfort with regulating pricing in general, your exchange rate plan is interesting, but presumably would raise prices in the 7 other countries, which could have the effect of lower aggregate demand.
sgtclub is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:28 AM.