| 
	
		
			
				|  » Site Navigation |  
	|  |  
	
		
			
				|  » Online Users: 102 |  
| 0 members and 102 guests |  
		| No Members online |  
		| Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM. |  | 
	
		|  |  |  
	
	
	
	
		|  02-23-2004, 01:53 PM | #2881 |  
	| I am beyond a rank! 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Appalaichan Trail 
					Posts: 6,201
				      | 
				
				Vote Nader!
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by str8outavannuys What's the deal with the $300.  Lots of people I know got a check in 2003, but my wife and I were left out.  I don't really think public money should go to lawyers earning 6 figures, but if everyone else got one, where's mine?    Anyone know if I got hosed?
 |  Is this the big tax rebate check thingy?  We got a $600 check, like, a year ago?  (I can't really remember when, but we definitely got the dough -- and used it too!)
 
Oh, and my guess for AL RBI leader?  Belnie (that's the Puerto Rican pronunciation) Williams. |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  02-23-2004, 01:53 PM | #2882 |  
	| Moderator 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Pop goes the chupacabra 
					Posts: 18,532
				      | 
				
				Vote Nader!
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by str8outavannuys What's the deal with the $300.  Lots of people I know got a check in 2003, but my wife and I were left out.  I don't really think public money should go to lawyers earning 6 figures, but if everyone else got one, where's mine?    Anyone know if I got hosed?
 |  Did you have kids?  And if you didn't get the check, you get the credit later on your taxes.
 
ETA:  Which is different from the $300 rebate/early refund DTB is referring to that came out the year before that, which, if you didn't get, you could also claim on your tax return. |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  02-23-2004, 01:55 PM | #2883 |  
	| Moderator 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Pop goes the chupacabra 
					Posts: 18,532
				      | 
				
				Query
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall And now I guess we will be subjected to that stupid avatar again, won't we?
 
 TM
 |  No need
 
spoiler
 
Bret Boone.  141. (googled, cuz, shit, that's trivia) |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  02-23-2004, 01:57 PM | #2884 |  
	| Steaming Hot 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Giving a three hour blowjob 
					Posts: 8,220
				      | 
				
				Vote Nader!
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by Hank Chinaski Himeland
 |  Do you have really large or fat fingers or something - so that making weird typos like this are just inevitable?  I don't spend that much time thinking about it, but I can't come up with any other explanation.
 
(and we Canadians got a big fat check for $600.  Because I am such a principled person, I donated my share to charity.  Please pat me on the back.) |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  02-23-2004, 02:01 PM | #2885 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Flyover land 
					Posts: 19,042
				      | 
				
				Ginger
			 
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  02-23-2004, 02:05 PM | #2886 |  
	| Wild Rumpus Facilitator 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: In a teeny, tiny, little office 
					Posts: 14,167
				      | 
				
				QUESTION ABOUT PURITY SCORES
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by sunnybunny I was thinking this morning as I was on hold with the Social Security Administration about many useless things, among them that I'd wager my purity score has dramatically changed since the last time I took the quiz.  When will it be time to take the purity test quiz thingy again?
 |  Wait until after taxapalooza.  I promise if you work wit me, I can drop your score a minumum of 20 points in a single evening.
				__________________Send in the evil clowns.
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  02-23-2004, 02:06 PM | #2887 |  
	| Consigliere 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Pelosi Land! 
					Posts: 9,480
				      | 
				
				Query
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| I wanted to say Manny or A-Rod, but I knew that wasn't right.  And now I guess we will be subjected to that stupid avatar again, won't we? 
 TM
 |  I was going to guess Edgar.  Which - although wrong by one year - still fits your response to a T. |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  02-23-2004, 02:06 PM | #2888 |  
	| Rageaholic 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: On the margins. 
					Posts: 3,507
				      | 
				
				Vote Nader!
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by greatwhitenorthchick Do you have really large or fat fingers or something - so that making weird typos like this are just inevitable?
 
 |  
You mean like typing in "spooky" instead of "mom, before the operation"?  Yeah, I'm beginning to think he does shit like that all the time.
				__________________Some people say I need anger management.  I say fuck them.
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  02-23-2004, 02:07 PM | #2889 |  
	| hippity hop, hippity hop! 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Out to lunch 
					Posts: 1,341
				      | 
				
				QUESTION ABOUT PURITY SCORES
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by taxwonk Wait until after taxapalooza.  I promise if you work wit me, I can drop your score a minumum of 20 points in a single evening.
 |  
That's right...I owe you somthing for saying "the girls" were "just fine"
 
SunnyBunny
				__________________KRUSTY
 So he's proactive, huh?
 
 EXECUTIVE
 Oh, God, yes. We're talking about a totally outrageous paradigm.
 
 MEYER
 Excuse me, but "proactive" and "paradigm"? Aren't these just buzzwords that dumb people use to sound important? Not that I'm accusing you of anything like that.
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  02-23-2004, 02:08 PM | #2890 |  
	| In my dreams ... 
				 
				Join Date: Apr 2003 
					Posts: 1,955
				      | 
				
				Sex and the City - get your spoilers here
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by robustpuppy How much of that is due to SJP's recent affectations, such as walking so that one foot crosses in front of the other, or looking down, and then looking up with pursed lips and squinty eyes, or looking up wistfully at the sky as if she would take off her beret and toss it, if only she weren't so melancholy, yet still somehow hopeful?
 |   Some of it.  Some of it is that, the way the character has been written for the last couple of seasons, she always seems put upon by others and never seems to do anything wrong.  First few seasons she was sort of an amusing fuckup.  Recently she's been sailing through life being put upon and dealing with adversity, etc, and it all seems sort of ... self-righteous or self-justifying, somehow.  
 
For example, the fact that they did a whole show about how justified Carrie was to be pissed off that a friend didn't understand spending $350 on shoes, and then make the friend replace said shoes when they were lost, and the show was written in such a way so that CARRIE WAS IN THE RIGHT ABOUT THIS WHILE THE OTHER WOMAN WAS THE ONE WHO WAS A SELF ABSORBED PRIG is just, somehow, not OK.  Real loss of perspective.  The best aspect of Carrie's character was that she was an amusing fuckup, and its nice to relate to someone who is amusing while they fuck up.  One is not able to relate to someone who may be amusing but is never actually wrong.
edited to add: but, yes, the marked increase in facial tics and body language that scream "I've been clinically diagonsed as a narcisistic personality" are annoying, too.
				__________________- Life is too short to wear cheap shoes.
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  02-23-2004, 02:13 PM | #2891 |  
	| Wild Rumpus Facilitator 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: In a teeny, tiny, little office 
					Posts: 14,167
				      | 
				
				Speaking of stupid quizzes...
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by Alex_de_Large You are a rule of civil procedure! Take this quiz  to find out which one.
 
 |  I am RULE 8(a)! You are Rule 8, the most laid back of all the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. While your forefather in the Federal Rules may have been a stickler for details and particularity, you have clearly rebelled by being pleasant and easy-going. Rule 8 only requires that a plaintiff provide a short and plain statement of a claim on which a court can grant relief. While there is much to be lauded in your approach, your good nature sometimes gets you in trouble, and you often have to rely on your good friend, Rule 56, to bail you out.
				__________________Send in the evil clowns.
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  02-23-2004, 02:17 PM | #2892 |  
	| I am beyond a rank! 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Glasgow, natch. 
					Posts: 2,807
				      | 
				
				Query
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) No need
 
 spoiler
 
 Bret Boone.  141. (googled, cuz, shit, that's trivia)
 |  Yeah, those final round questions are tough.  We guessed Manny.  Another good one (and this is if people really want to procrastinate) was as follows:
 
A farmer wants to plant 10 trees.  He wants them to be planted in five rows, with each row containing four trees.  Draw the arrangement of trees that he plants. |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  02-23-2004, 02:24 PM | #2893 |  
	| Proud Holder-Post 200,000 
				 
				Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Corner Office 
					Posts: 86,149
				      | 
				
				Vote Nader!
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by greatwhitenorthchick Do you have really large or fat fingers or something - so that making weird typos like this are just inevitable?  I don't spend that much time thinking about it, but I can't come up with any other explanation.
 
 (and we Canadians got a big fat check for $600.  Because I am such a principled person, I donated my share to charity.  Please pat me on the back.)
 |  I'm extremely busy so I often post using VRS, which has its limitations. 
 
I received a check from Canadian gov't a few years back (Via Rail is gov't isn't it?) because a train I was on crashed. Via refunded our fare. Me, my wife and kids (at the time 3 and 6) also all received a 20 page multiple choice survey about the train crash (Were facing rearwardly or forwardly at impact? Did your head strike anything at impact?) 
 
I was surprised there would be a preprinted form for train crash survivors- I would have expected a phone call at the least. Plus the question for the 3 year old should have included color pictures. |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  02-23-2004, 02:27 PM | #2894 |  
	| No title 
				 
				Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Here 
					Posts: 8,092
				      | 
				
				Query
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) No need
 
 spoiler
 
 Bret Boone.  141. (googled, cuz, shit, that's trivia)
 |  So Jose Canseco was on the sports report after the news last night.  He was hesitant to give out much information on his steroid arrest other than "read my book, which is coming out soon."  And "my urine sample was switched at the police station" and "it was a conspiracy to have me arrested." And "I'm not saying that Barry Bonds is juiced, but I'm suspicious."
 
"Oh and hey by the way, I've been invited to the Dodger Spring Training for tryouts next week."
 
Question, can a guy who looked obviously juiced last night and bigger than he's ever been, and arrested for steroid use/sales come back to baseball?
				__________________Ritchie Incognito is a shitbag.
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  02-23-2004, 02:28 PM | #2895 |  
	| Too Good For Post Numbers 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 
					Posts: 65,535
				      | 
				
				Speaking of stupid quizzes...
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by taxwonk I am RULE 8(a)! You are Rule 8, the most laid back of all the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.  . . .
 |  Congratulations!  You are Rule 703, Rules of Evidence, Bases of Opinion Testimony By Experts!  You are distinctly qualified to criticize profferred "experts" based on bias, or perceptions of bias.  Your favorite color is blue, your favorite fruitcake is Josh. |  
	|   |  |  
	
		|  |  |  
 
 
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is Off 
 |  |  |  
 
	
	
		
	
	
 |