Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone_Slothrop
Courts will interpret the text, not Allard's explanation.
|
Sure, but despite atticus's strict constructionism, interpreting the constitution has not been uniformly conducted in Scalia's Chevron-type Stage I, Stage II analysis. If a party marshalls uniform evidence of what an amendment was purportedly designed to accomplish, and it's spelled out in tabular form at the
Alliance for Marriage's website, and, if Allard is an
indicium of what R's mean, there are enough wacko judges on the 9th circuit to limit the interpretation to allow for the enforcement of legislatively initiated and passed laws providing for civil unions.
Threaded Mode