Quote:
Originally posted by sgtclub
You don't think it was (a) irresponsible and (b) for purely political purposes for them to hold the press conference without first checking the story with State? I'm all for dissent, but I think when there are troops in harm's way, it is encumbent on our elected reps to apply a greater level of scrutiny before "supporting" such allegations.*
*Hank, this is a prompt for you. Please post our party line regarding interesting allegations.
|
C'mon, you just got bandwagonned. Should've been ready for it.
"Treason" is no longer an acceptable word for this sort of situation. It would have been better for you to merely indicate that these particular politicians have the intelligence of rocks (sedimentary, specifically), and the ethics of monitor lizards. (Don't ask. They're very unethical, for lizards.)
Wait, can we still say "ethics"?
Threaded Mode