LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 4,024
0 members and 4,024 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 03-16-2004, 04:51 PM   #11
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,150
Prediction

Quote:
Originally posted by Secret_Agent_Man
Sanctions were imposed and maintained for a variety of reasons, beginning before the first Gulf War and continuing until after the second Gulf War.

The sanctions regime you're referring to began after the first Gulf War, and its removal was contingent upon Iraq satisfying many conditions. Chief among them, but not the only problem, was Iraq's failure to provide proof that it had complied with the various U.N. resolutions requiring WMD disarmament as a condition for ending the 1st Gulf War. Iraq also had failed to pay the requisite reparations to Kuwait, failed to account for and return a number of Kuwaiti captives after the war, etc.

What were you asking, again?

S_A_M
because it failed to pay $$ the UN wouldn't let it make $$$? did it hear about England's problem with debtor's prisons?
thank you for the confirmation, although I still give TY till 5 to contradict what is now our position.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:54 PM.