LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 1,990
0 members and 1,990 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 03-18-2004, 12:14 AM   #11
sgtclub
Serenity Now
 
sgtclub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Survivor Island
Posts: 7,007
This just in -- the Earth is flat.

Quote:
Originally posted by Secret_Agent_Man
Please club, do explain what the difference is between "imminent danger (or threat)" and "immediate danger (or threat)" in this context? If you need to turn to a dictionary, you lose. Most Americans don't have one handy when watching TV.
This is a waste of time, but fun nonetheless.

No dictionary necessary:

Statement 1:

Quote:
some have argued that the the nuclear threat from Iraq is not imminent, that Saddam is at least five to seven years away from having nuclear weapons. I would not be so certain.'
The "I would not be so certain" refers to the time frame (of 5 to 7 years) before Saddam would have nuclear weapons, meaning that he thinks that Saddam could have them before that time. There is another, weaker argument here, but I won't go into that.

Statement 2:

Quote:
No terrorist state poses a greater or more immediate threat to the security of our people and the stability of the world and the regime of Saddam Hussein in Iraq
This is a statement of relativity. He is not saying the threat posed by Iraq or any other country is immediate. He is saying that if he had to rank all countries in order of the most pressing threat, Iraq would be at the top of the list.

Questions/comments?
sgtclub is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:16 PM.