Quote:
Originally posted by Secret_Agent_Man
In what way, club?
Here is what he said (omitting the first sentence where he talked about your beliefs):
"Making it easier for employers to fire or lay off workers and off shore jobs makes the economy more efficient, and likely leads to faster growth of GDP, but it decreases job security.
It's harder to fire workers in Europe and Japan than in the US. If there is a backlash against gains in productivity, immigration and offshoring, americans could decide US workers need protection and make the US job market less liquid."
Ok? Please tell me what he said that is not true, and why.
S_A_M
|
Because, like all em's economic arguments, it never looks at what the effects of em's proposed policy would have. Yes, it is possible to implement the rules em proposes, but it would not have the effect em thinks - quite the opposite.
Threaded Mode