Less to See than on NHL Center Ice®

[SlaveNoMore]

sebastian_dangerfield
And you want to be Jay Leno.

I envy his car collection.

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
this is the PM exchange I had with him:

• Hank: hey- waz up?
  SS: ummm n'mucho
  Hank: can i say sumthin?
  Hank: maybe wil bug ya-
  SS: Wha
  Hank: your posts lately, its like you're all sweetness and lite
  SS: FU
  Hank:serious- you used to be mean and prickly, now you're like a gadfly or sumthin- just saying peeps liked U cuz you were snotty, now its liek you're runnin for sumthin
  SS: Its just my job and GF are great right noe- so i'm happy can't be snotty w/o the snot
  Hank: more than that- its like you and paigow since you became the social comm organizing field trips and shit- you don't wana offend anyone hardly-
  SS: FU- you're the nice one
  Hank: I made a resolution to be nice- you've slipped into it
  Hank: and T. not around- someone must of decided not to "take it" and when he is he's not mean, so its all nice- its boring
  SS: hmmm you're an ass
  Hank: see that was mean but not clever- you were clever mean b4- just saying FWIW

I heard he PM'd someone to say I was dogging people, so I just wanted to get the truth out there.

This is generally funny when Flower does it. Not sure why it's not clicking for you.

[bold_n_brazen]

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
The last time I saw several folks on acid, they railed against the "preposterous nature of everything going on around them" by climbing a five foot fence fence into someone's private yard, shedding their clothes and climbing a tree.

Dangerous? Perhaps not. Amusing? For me, sure. For the guy who owned the house? Prob not. But is this the type of behavior we really want to encourage?

I, for one, want to encourage this kind of behavior.

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
The last time I saw several folks on acid, they railed against the "preposterous nature of everything going on around them" by climbing a five foot fence fence into someone's private yard, shedding their clothes and climbing a tree.

Dangerous? Perhaps not. Amusing? For me, sure. For the guy who owned the house? Prob not. But is this the type of behavior we really want to encourage?

Have you ever eaten acid? If you haven't, there's no use in us debating. You wouldn't understand anything I said.

I'll assume someone like you who portrays himself as a man about town has eaten it, so here's my reply:

Yes, people act absurd. But they also have some pretty good insights about things as well. You can't take the most absurd behavior you've seen and use that as a basis to assume all behavior on that particular drug is ludicrous idiocy.

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally posted by ironweed
This is generally funny when Flower does it. Not sure why it's not clicking for you.

sometimes I force stuff when it's boring- didn't know this was propietary.

Originally posted by bold_n_brazen
I, for one, want to encourage this kind of behavior.

2. Slave has gotten all uptight in his old age. He's gonna be the kind of old man who won't throw your baseball back when it goes over his fence.

[greatwhitenorthchick]

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
But what did you learn from them? I don't remember that part.


eta: stp, and I miss Kim Possible, too, not that I have any complaints about the current avatar

Everything I know today I learned from christmas ornaments.

I kind of miss Kim too. How do you store an avatar so you don't lose it when you want to bring it back? I would hate to switch to Kim and lose my beautiful hot torso.

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
sometimes I force stuff when it's boring- didn't know this was propietary.

Not at all. It's just a form that doesn't seem to showcase your material as well. Have you tried the "open letter to" format?

[mmm3587]

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Yes, people act absurd. But they also have some pretty good insights about things as well. You can't take the most absurd behavior you've seen and use that as a basis to assume all behavior on that particular drug is ludicrous idiocy.

Except for the one time someone said, "Dude, it looks like that pile of clothes is on fire!"* and it actually was, I haven't heard a lot of "pretty good insights" from people on acid. Never has that wall actually been melting or has that tv actually been growling at me.

* Candles are dangerous when you're all fucked up, k?

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally posted by ironweed
Not at all. It's just a form that doesn't seem to showcase your material as well. Have you tried the "open letter to" format?

I mainly wanted to use the "social comm" line, and I'm not allowed to go Guernica anymore.....

Originally posted by sunnybunny
Translation: Fuck me once, shame on you; don't fuck me twice, deal with my disgruntled posts for an eternity.

translation: look at me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I am really smart and witty, no really.

[taxwonk]

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
The last time I saw several folks on acid, they railed against the "preposterous nature of everything going on around them" by climbing a five foot fence fence into someone's private yard, shedding their clothes and climbing a tree.

Dangerous? Perhaps not. Amusing? For me, sure. For the guy who owned the house? Prob not. But is this the type of behavior we really want to encourage?

But you left out so many important details. Did he shoot at you? Did you get arrested? What does it feel like to get cornholed by a biker who's in for killing his Mama feel like when you're tripping?

God is in the details, Dude.

[Dualit]

Originally posted by greatwhitenorthchick
I'll take your nice Michael J. Fox and raise you one imperious Alex Trebek.

And don't get her started on Celine Dion.

[Gattigap]

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
But is this the type of behavior we really want to encourage?

If it's helpful, I'm told that Sebby's experiments in this area often involve chains, and that therefore the restraints help reduce the threat of injury.

From the hallucinogenics, of course.

[SlaveNoMore]

ironweed
2. Slave has gotten all uptight in his old age. He's gonna be the kind of old man who won't throw your baseball back when it goes over his fence.

Fuck 'em, I say. Keep it in the park.

---
Speaking of this, I recently watched the new DVD release of the 1960's Antonioni film Blow Up. I thought something was different, so I read some on-line commentary.

For some unknown reason, the DVD drops the scene in the beginning where the main character won't throw the "tennis ball" back to the mimes. As there is a parallel scene at the end, when he does throw the ball back, this edit makes no sense.

Can someone here drop some acid and perhaps elighten me as to why a studio would cut a necessary film scene from a film re-release?