Fashion Board 6-9-04 to 7-13-04

[Did you just call me Coltrane?]

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
disagree. Duff's face is hot? Seems a bit too taylor dayne to me. Not saying she's awful, but how can you dismiss Lindsay on the basis of her breasts?

After this picture, I'm going with...what are my other dirty old man options?

[SlaveNoMore]

Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Not saying she's awful, but how can you dismiss Lindsay on the basis of her breasts?

I look at jpegs of Lohan and can almost taste the cigarette smoke.

[Shape Shifter]

Originally posted by Did you just call me Coltrane?
After this picture, I'm going with...what are my other dirty old man options?

Hermione.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
I look at jpegs of Lohan and can almost taste the cigarette smoke.

Cigarette smoke? A glass of milk will wash away the taste.

[Did you just call me Coltrane?]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
Cigarette smoke? A glass of milk will wash away the taste.

Does she even have a face? I haven't looked yet.

[sunnybunny]

Originally posted by ThurgreedMarshall
Which one of you in your relationship is obsessed with collecting lunch boxes again?

TM

Let me explain to you a little something about love as I see it, Thurgreed. It might even help you to interact with your significant other in a manner that gives her a disincentive to telling you about all the men who are hitting on her in a desparate attempt to get some attention from you. When you care deeply about someone, you do not dismiss their interests/passions/obsessions. You nurture them, support them and embrace them as part of the person. That does not mean you have to adopt them as your own, but you should react positively to them, unless of course his or her interest would be "acting in a way that makes him or her appear available in a cry for attention, then acting shocked when someone acts on it, and then going home and telling one's other half about in in an effort once again to get attention." That, you should discourage. Just my advice. Take it for what it's worth. If you'd like some follow up reading on today's lesson, you might try "I Love You Ronnie"--Nancy Reagan's publication of Ronald Reagan's love letters to her.

[Shape Shifter]

Originally posted by sunnybunny
Let me explain to you a little something about love as I see it, Thurgreed. It might even help you to interact with your significant other in a manner that gives her a disincentive to telling you about all the men who are hitting on her in a desparate attempt to get some attention from you. When you care deeply about someone, you do not dismiss their interests/passions/obsessions. You nurture them, support them and embrace them as part of the person. That does not mean you have to adopt them as your own, but you should react positively to them, unless of course his or her interest would be "acting in a way that makes him or her appear available in a cry for attention, then acting shocked when someone acts on it, and then going home and telling one's other half about in in an effort once again to get attention." That, you should discourage. Just my advice. Take it for what it's worth. If you'd like some follow up reading on today's lesson, you might try "I Love You Ronnie"--Nancy Reagan's publication of Ronald Reagan's love letters to her.

I don't think Nancy would have loved him as much if he collected lunchboxes.

[baltassoc]

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
I want to buy a couple of suits...Say I want to spend $500-$600 for something conservative (irony acknowledged) yet stylish, and sufficiently well made to withstand the rigors of the triplet toddlers

I say go with something in a pinstripe:



Men's Cotton Coverall - Five Color Coices

[Not Bob]

Not that my vote counts, but this dude is worse than the guy who wanted watersports from RT's sister on a first date.

From The Gawker:

To: [X] Subject: Invoice 6/12/04 Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 17:15:59 EDT

Dear [WOMAN'S NAME]

On June 5, you agreed to accept dinner, paid for in full, by me, based on your stated offer that we would go out again. In that you have ignored all overtures to said follow up meeting, you are hereby considered in breach of contract.

To that end, you are being invoiced for 50% of the cost of the dinner, pursuant to the offer. For the record, the offer presented you with the option of not going out again and paying for half of the dinner, or going out again and not paying at all. You accepted these terms, choosing to go out again, as stated above, but have since failed to deliver your end of the agreement. In that this was merely a promise to meet, and not a promise to marry, the agreement is binding under New York law and does not require a written agreement (i.e. statute of frauds).

Furthermore, this is absolutely not a joke.

Your share is 50% of $74.51 which is a total of $37.25. Payment in full is expected within 30 days.

You may remit to:

[MAN'S NAME AND ADDRESS]

[notcasesensitive]

Originally posted by sunnybunny
Let me explain to you a little something about love as I see it, Thurgreed. It might even help you to interact with your significant other in a manner that gives her a disincentive to telling you about all the men who are hitting on her in a desparate attempt to get some attention from you. When you care deeply about someone, you do not dismiss their interests/passions/obsessions. You nurture them, support them and embrace them as part of the person. That does not mean you have to adopt them as your own, but you should react positively to them, unless of course his or her interest would be "acting in a way that makes him or her appear available in a cry for attention, then acting shocked when someone acts on it, and then going home and telling one's other half about in in an effort once again to get attention." That, you should discourage. Just my advice. Take it for what it's worth. If you'd like some follow up reading on today's lesson, you might try "I Love You Ronnie"--Nancy Reagan's publication of Ronald Reagan's love letters to her.

You do seem like a caring nurturer. I just thought that you posted relentlessly about lunchboxes for my own personal amusement, but if you seriously devote the amount of time to lunchboxes that your posts would indicate, my guess is that you will break said boyfriend of any interest in them whatsoever at some time in the near future. Sort of like the way a grandma, after latching onto the idea that little Jimmy LOVES chocolate cake makes them for him incessently until at some point in his thirties Jimmy (who now goes by James) lashes out at sweet little grandma with something to the effect of: "Thanks AGAIN grandma for ANOTHER homemade chocolate cake, but I really feel that it is my duty to inform you that I'm allergic to chocolate and I'm more of a banana cream pie guy now. Please cut the damn chocolate cake thing from 25 years ago out already. And by the way, everyone calls me James now."

As far as I can tell, in the world of collecting random shit, Hummels will be next on bf's list. Don't be surprised when he drops the No More Lunchboxes bomb. Good news is I'm sure you'll be able to offload your inventory on eBay to some other lunchbox freak.

[Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)]

Originally posted by Penske_Account

Also I have a hard time getting over Duff's name. Maybe if she put a paperbag over the first half.......

A propos of, well, your return:

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by sunnybunny
Let me explain to you a little something about love as I see it, Thurgreed. It might even help you to interact with your significant other in a manner that gives her a disincentive to telling you about all the men who are hitting on her in a desparate attempt to get some attention from you. When you care deeply about someone, you do not dismiss their interests/passions/obsessions. You nurture them, support them and embrace them as part of the person. That does not mean you have to adopt them as your own, but you should react positively to them, unless of course his or her interest would be "acting in a way that makes him or her appear available in a cry for attention, then acting shocked when someone acts on it, and then going home and telling one's other half about in in an effort once again to get attention." That, you should discourage. Just my advice. Take it for what it's worth. If you'd like some follow up reading on today's lesson, you might try "I Love You Ronnie"--Nancy Reagan's publication of Ronald Reagan's love letters to her.

Very heartwarming sentiments Bunny. I would add that in addition to that fine tome from the venerable former first lady that Mr. Thurgreed Marshall might also want to pick up the following book and enlighten himself a little bit:

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by notcasesensitive
You do seem like a caring nurturer. I just thought that you posted relentlessly about lunchboxes for my own personal amusement, but if you seriously devote the amount of time to lunchboxes that your posts would indicate, my guess is that you will break said boyfriend of any interest in them whatsoever at some time in the near future. Sort of like the way a grandma, after latching onto the idea that little Jimmy LOVES chocolate cake makes them for him incessently until at some point in his thirties Jimmy (who now goes by James) lashes out at sweet little grandma with something to the effect of: "Thanks AGAIN grandma for ANOTHER homemade chocolate cake, but I really feel that it is my duty to inform you that I'm allergic to chocolate and I'm more of a banana cream pie guy now. Please cut the damn chocolate cake thing from 25 years ago out already. And by the way, everyone calls me James now."

As far as I can tell, in the world of collecting random shit, Hummels will be next on bf's list. Don't be surprised when he drops the No More Lunchboxes bomb. Good news is I'm sure you'll be able to offload your inventory on eBay to some other lunchbox freak.

ps: I also had a banana splits lunchbox but I think my grandmama threw it away. Thanks for reminding me.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
A propos of, well, your return:

This is what restraint looks like.

[robustpuppy]

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
A propos of, well, your return:

Gotta admit, her colorist is a genius.