Fashion Board 5-7-04 to 6-9-04

[Not Flaming]

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
And just like that .....

POOF... the socks go away

Conversing with your own socks is a definite sign of looserdom. Whifferoonini! Get a room already.

[ltl/fb]

Originally posted by Not Flaming
Conversing with your own socks is a definite sign of looserdom. Whifferoonini! Get a room already.

Does one really need a Room Of One's Own to masturbate? isn't one sort of in the room? Or a box? Which is like a room, in that it is a three-dimesional square.

[Skeks in the city]

Originally posted by mmm3587

I get this call a month or two ago from this guy ... We'll call him asshole....

Don't try fucking the asshole.

Have partners you like keep you busy enough that you don't need to work for asshole.

[ltl/fb]

Originally posted by Skeks in the city
Originally posted by mmm3587



Don't try fucking the asshole.

Have partners you like keep you busy enough that you don't need to work for asshole.

Do fuck the asshole. Film it. Post it. Live it. Be it.

[sunnybunny]

Originally posted by mmm3587

And, actually, maybe I am spoiled at current firm, but I would take offense even if someone I really liked told me unequivocably not to work for someone else. It was that kind of territorial tomfoolery that caused me, in part, to leave my first firm, and I've never looked backwith regret.

Then you're not taking the right approach to work. Unless you're a partner, you are there to do a specific group's partners' work. If other partners in other groups are asking you to do work, it takes away from your ability to do your own work. A partner who says I want my associates available to do our group's work and not messing around with other random joe's in the firm, as long as he has the work to support you, shouldn't be considered to be considered territorial tomfoolery, he shoudl be considered someone who is concerned about not overworking his associates lending them out to jackasses and someone who hires people for HIS group to work in HIS group and should be able to expect that you are available to do the group's work and not tied up doing someone else's crap.

[Tyrone Slothrop]

Originally posted by sunnybunny
Then you're not taking the right approach to work. Unless you're a partner, you are there to do a specific group's partners' work. If other partners in other groups are asking you to do work, it takes away from your ability to do your own work. A partner who says I want my associates available to do our group's work and not messing around with other random joe's in the firm, as long as he has the work to support you, shouldn't be considered to be considered territorial tomfoolery, he shoudl be considered someone who is concerned about not overworking his associates lending them out to jackasses and someone who hires people for HIS group to work in HIS group and should be able to expect that you are available to do the group's work and not tied up doing someone else's crap.

Have any of the associates in larger offices of your firm organized themselves into guilds? Does your partner have a really cool coat of arms?

[sunnybunny]

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Have any of the associates in larger offices of your firm organized themselves into guilds? Does your partner have a really cool coat of arms?

Bitter contract attorney hack hunting for overtime, Ty?

[Tyrone Slothrop]

Originally posted by sunnybunny
Bitter contract attorney hack hunting for overtime, Ty?

Wrong, but you get some credit for a quick response.

I just work at a shop where associates are not the vassals of individual lords, er, partners.

[mmm3587]

Originally posted by ltl/fb
Do fuck the asshole. Film it. Post it. Live it. Be it.

I want you so bad the way that I can never tell if you're joking with all this triple entendre and your happy pussy avatar and your dirty looks and the way that you fantasize about me.

Since Slot C girl had been several months now, I may audition a replacement. You're in the running!

[mmm3587]

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Wrong, but you get some credit for a quick response.

I just work at a shop where associates are not the vassals of individual lords, er, partners.

Yeah, I think that some people don't understand that law firms can be organized in very different ways and have very different cultures and that universal answers don't work. My firm has very discrete groups but no compulsory assignment system, which I like quite a bit.

[Not Me]

Originally posted by Slave Once Again
Muffindearest, we acknowledge the genius thing but are much more interested in a graphic display of your bra size than your IQ.

Here is a reasonable facsimile of my breasts, only mine are white with pink nipples and aren't quite as low as these. The shape is similar.

[SPREE - naked boobs]
http://www.playboy.com/magazine/play...t0604_playmate

[ltl/fb]

Originally posted by mmm3587
I want you so bad the way that I can never tell if you're joking with all this triple entendre and your happy pussy avatar and your dirty looks and the way that you fantasize about me.

Since Slot C girl had been several months now, I may audition a replacement. You're in the running!

I hate you too. And it's a sleepy kitten. Not necessarily happy.

Night night.

[Not Me]

Originally posted by ltl/fb
And it's a sleepy kitten.

It is a sweepy, wittle, kitty-kitty. So, cute. It is the only thing about you that I like I hate everything else.

[ABBAKiss]

Originally posted by Slave Once Again
Muffindearest, we acknowledge the genius thing but are much more interested in a graphic display of your bra size than your IQ.

Bitch please. The entire FB has already seen multiple graphic displays of my TITS (a subsitute for bra size, I suppose), as has most of Minnesota, much of Europe, and some on each cost.

The more I think about it, the same is true for my IQ. IQ is substitute for "fancy place" a/k/a pussy, right?

[ABBAKiss]

"Reasonable facsimile" is not good enough. Post your own and then get out of dodge.