Less to See than on NHL Center Ice® - Page 38

megaloman · 02-22-2005, 07:23 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by paigowprincess
So I am at a lovely neighborhood cafe enjoying a delicious meal when the man next to me starts chatting with me. I chat back bc the subject is real estate which I am very into right now. For some reason, the subject turns to Shirley Temple. First I say, "Oh, man, I should have put her on my death pool list. Isnt she like, 100?" Then I ask the guy if he supposes she was the inspiration for Baby Jane. Later, when I leave bc he wont stop talking, blah blah blah, he gives me his business card and told me to check out his name. I failed to make any connection but, lo and behold, he is the offspring of Miss Shirley TEmple. Whoops.

She was a terrible actress. I don't think she was the inspiration for anything, although I suppose she did the best she could considering she never had a normal upbringing. The curse of the hollyweird lifestyle on these childstars is tragic.

ThurgreedMarshall · 02-22-2005, 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
I like being naked at every opportunity, but the opportunity has never arisen...

You should see a doctor about this.

TM

Shape Shifter · 02-22-2005, 07:25 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by paigowprincess
Isnt this your second post about why you dont like going commando? We get it. Nut sweat, Enough already.

Now, my problem with commando is that I like that extra layer of cloth between me and someone I don't want to see's cooter/package, cooter or package. Plus, the potential pubes, urine drops, its just unsanitary and gross.

Unless you are in Vegas, then its fine. Get the full on wax and enjoy the feel of the desert breeze kissing your exposed inners. I imainge it might be sort or what having a dick flopping aroud woudl be like.

C'mon, you know we're both paid by the post. Resist the urge to feel all high and mighty following your chance mealtime encounter with the cast of Scrubs.

I can sorta see the point in gwink's post about wanting to make things readily accessible. But I believe this applies more to women and not men, and then only if you're anticipating sex in semi-public places like a restroom stall or a hostess stand.

Point taken about the nut sweat, but urine drops aren't a concern of mine. Thanks for the tap.

Hank Chinaski · 02-22-2005, 07:25 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by paigowprincess
So I am at a lovely neighborhood cafe enjoying a delicious meal when the man next to me starts chatting with me. I chat back bc the subject is real estate which I am very into right now. For some reason, the subject turns to Shirley Temple. First I say, "Oh, man, I should have put her on my death pool list. Isnt she like, 100?" Then I ask the guy if he supposes she was the inspiration for Baby Jane. Later, when I leave bc he wont stop talking, blah blah blah, he gives me his business card and told me to check out his name. I failed to make any connection but, lo and behold, he is the offspring of Miss Shirley TEmple. Whoops.

Dear, he wants her dead more than you. he has real tangible reason, not some pool for pride.

tmdiva · 02-22-2005, 07:32 PM

American Idol recap:

I thought I liked about half the guys, but almost everyone sucked! The fact that so many otherwise good singers stumbled when trying to sing miked with a band shows that it takes a special kind of ear to be a pop star.

Nikko: Nice upper register. However, serious pitch problems at the end of every phrase in his mid-range. No charisma.

Scott: Aside from a slightly Neville-esque vibrato, I thought he sounded great. AND he managed to convey the emotion of the song, which I had been doubtful he would be able to do. I voted for him.

Anthony: Dropping your real name (Anatoly) was a huge mistake, because that and the tracheotomy are the only interesting things about this guy. Bo-ring.

Bo: Perfect song choice and nice performance. Nice body to his voice. I didn't like him before (they hadn't shown him much), but I like him now. I voted for him, too.

Travis: Seriously nervous. Kept smiling broadly to keep his lips from trembling, and singing without vibrato to keep his voice from quavering. Very cute guy but not an exciting singer. Some pitch problems at the ends of phrases.

Constantine: I liked him a lot going in, but he just didn't wow me here. The experience I assumed he would have performing with a microphone did not play out, and he had some of the same problems as Leah "Labelle" last year. Hard to describe, but it has to do with how things sound differently to you and to other people.

David: Ouch. Out of tune for almost the whole song. Strained quality to his voice that doesn't play well over a mike.

Jared: Totally boy-band. Boring.

Anwar: Nice voice with body. Love the middle-school music teacher angle. Sang confidently. Voted for him.

Judd: Boy-band look, vintage rocker sound. He did okay, but I don't have much hope of seeing great range and flexibility from this guy.

Joseph: Sang better than Michael Bolton, but that's not saying terribly much. Also boring. Sets off my gaydar, NTTAWWT.

Mario: Some mishit notes, but great energy. Is he crosseyed, or does he just look that way sometimes? I am bugged by the (mis)pronunciation of his last name.

Girls tonight--for their sake I hope they learn from the boys' mistakes, or it will be a long night.

tm

PS Anyone else watch The Bachelorette: the Men Tell All last night? Josh Virgin Marathoner is still sending my gaydar into the red zone. And he's just so angry. The Nile is not just a river in Egypt, Joshy-boy. Somebody get this kid into therapy.

Did you just call me Coltrane? · 02-22-2005, 07:33 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by tmdiva
The Nile is not just a river in Egypt, Joshy-boy.

Actually, yes it is.

ltl/fb · 02-22-2005, 07:39 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by greatwhitenorthchick
I have gone commando under a skirt or dress before because I wanted to get laid without having to take off my clothes (i.e. in a bathroom stall or conference room).

Other than for that purpose, I agree with you. I don't see the point.

Ditto. I don't see the point of commando unless you are wearing a skirt. With pants/trousers/slacks/whatever, you have to take those off anyway (or lower them) and it's just as easy to take BOTH the panties/drawers/underwear/inner lower-body garment AND the outer lower garment off as it is to take just the outer lower-body garment off.

Replaced_Texan · 02-22-2005, 07:53 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
Ditto. I don't see the point of commando unless you are wearing a skirt. With pants/trousers/slacks/whatever, you have to take those off anyway (or lower them) and it's just as easy to take BOTH the panties/drawers/underwear/inner lower-body garment AND the outer lower garment off as it is to take just the outer lower-body garment off.

I went through a commando only phase back in college. These days it's generally a skirt only thing and doesn't happen nearly as often as it used to. I do laundry more frequently now.

In other news, I was in an OB/GYN office today and now have the oddest desire to make an anonymous donation of Georgia O'Keefe prints for the waiting room. They'd probably figure out it was me though.

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy · 02-22-2005, 07:55 PM

For those not understanding Commando, try it. Find yourself a nice set of pants (not wool, preferably all cotton or a something and silk blend; ideally cashmere if anyone else still wears cashmere pants) and set yourself free for a day. Let's declare this Friday LawTalkers Go-Commando Day. If five of you naysayers try, I'll bet three will be converts.

It's like taking your shoes or tie off - a small bit of freedom in an uptight world.

Shape Shifter · 02-22-2005, 08:03 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
For those not understanding Commando, try it. Find yourself a nice set of pants (not wool, preferably all cotton or a something and silk blend; ideally cashmere if anyone else still wears cashmere pants) and set yourself free for a day. Let's declare this Friday LawTalkers Go-Commando Day. If five of you naysayers try, I'll bet three will be converts.

It's like taking your shoes or tie off - a small bit of freedom in an uptight world.

Why not just wear silk boxers?

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy · 02-22-2005, 08:19 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Shape Shifter
Why not just wear silk boxers?

I'm talking freedom and you're asking for a roomier cage.

Try it, lizard, just try it. You have nothing to lose.

ltl/fb · 02-22-2005, 08:35 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
I'm talking freedom and you're asking for a roomier cage.

Try it, lizard, just try it. You have nothing to lose.

He could come down with a UTI and get pee on his nice cashmere pants.

Greedy,Greedy,Greedy · 02-22-2005, 08:44 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ltl/fb
He could come down with a UTI and get pee on his nice cashmere pants.

So none of you are up to the challenge? Think on how boring you've all become.

ltl/fb · 02-22-2005, 08:45 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
So none of you are up to the challenge? Think on how boring you've all become.

I have gone commando, but mostly only in skirts. I find it uncomfortable in two-legged lower-body outer garments.

ETA and, assuming you see this commando thing as semi-sexual, I think a guy who seems excited/jazzed (as at something unusual) that a woman would be pondering her undergarments before a date is not one to yap about other people being boring.

02-22-2005, 09:00 PM

My favorite TV show is the subject of a Salon interview. Str8? Have you seen this guy eat luncH?

http://www.salon.com/ent/feature/200...rer/index.html