Fashion Board 5-7-04 to 6-9-04

[str8outavannuys]

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
I've seen it, but I've always hoped I was missing something.

Somebody throw Ty a link to the Onion article about Calvin peeing.

[ltl/fb]

Originally posted by str8outavannuys
I can't get you a meeting, but I can get you some CDs if you'd like them.

[CDs?]

Yeah, See Deez Nuts. Actually, I take that back, I can get you a meeting . . . with Eileen.

[Eileen? Eileen who?]

I lean back so you can rub on Deez Nuts.

wow.

[Slave Once Again]

Originally posted by ABBAKiss
Who the fuck are you?

Once Again. Slave Once Again. 007th year.

[Alex_de_Large]

Originally posted by ltl/fb
wow.

ETA: googling "deez nuts" from work can be a dangerous thing.

[Gattigap]

Originally posted by Did you just call me Coltrane?
I haven't been to redneck Florida* in a while, so things may have changed.

*98% of the state.

It's not just there. Copyright infringement of Bill Watterson's work is alive and thriving on the rear panels of trucks of all sizes throughout most portions of the Southeast, and I don't just say that because of my, ah, homage in that oeuvre.

[Atticus Grinch]

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
That would have been the best Bond movie, except that Roger Moore was in it.

She is a spooky dead ringer for Caroline Dhavernas, the hottie from "Wonderfalls." It might have occurred to me sooner if the Wonderfalls character was an ace with a crossbow. Who, it occurs to me, would have made a pretty good Helen.



In other news, Tarantino wants to make* Casino Royale.**

*Make. Not re-make. The steaming piece of monkeycrap with Niven doesn't count.

**Expected jokes about Casino Royale with Cheese are noted. You are thanked in advance for your time, and urged to move on.

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by Alex_de_Large
Agreed, though he was tolerable in it. A Connery in his prime would have made that movie mythic.

Moore is unfairly whipped as a shitty Bond. Sure, nobody's Connery, but come on... Somebody had to play the part, and I think Moore did an admirable job of playing the smoothest of the Bonds. Where Connery's Bond got hot headed and had some weaknesses, Moore's Bond never got above room temperature and cruised through everything without wrinkling his lapel.

Of course, none compare to the classic Lazenby...

[Alex_de_Large]

Originally posted by Atticus Grinch **Expected jokes about Casino Royale with Cheese are noted. You are thanked in advance for your time, and urged to move on.

I don't think so...

[Tyrone Slothrop]

Originally posted by str8outavannuys
Somebody throw Ty a link to the Onion article about Calvin peeing.

This here post is a real value-add. Thanks so much.

[Tyrone Slothrop]

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Moore is unfairly whipped as a shitty Bond. Sure, nobody's Connery, but come on... Somebody had to play the part, and I think Moore did an admirable job of playing the smoothest of the Bonds. Where Connery's Bond got hot headed and had some weaknesses, Moore's Bond never got above room temperature and cruised through everything without wrinkling his lapel.

Of course, none compare to the classic Lazenby...

Moore is fairly whipped as a shitty Bond, since all of the others -- Lazenby too -- were better. The recent movies have sucked, but I think that's the screenwriting, or lack thereof, not the Bonds.

[Alex_de_Large]

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
This here post is a real value-add. Thanks so much.

I would but the Onion has apparently set up a "Premium Service", and we mere mortals can no longer access the archives.

[Aloha Mr. Learned Hand]

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore



Over/Under: 8 months

Got the other two but you lost me on this one...

What's that, the over/under on how long you'd get for stalking Tuesday Weld?

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Moore is unfairly whipped as a shitty Bond. Sure, nobody's Connery, but come on... Somebody had to play the part, and I think Moore did an admirable job of playing the smoothest of the Bonds. Where Connery's Bond got hot headed and had some weaknesses, Moore's Bond never got above room temperature and cruised through everything without wrinkling his lapel.

Of course, none compare to the classic Lazenby...

the Moore Bonds were when they're turned slapstick/silly. you can't compare, but if you do compare, I'll just say i'd spin with sean anytime....

:love: :love:

[NotFromHere]

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Moore is fairly whipped as a shitty Bond, since all of the others -- Lazenby too -- were better. The recent movies have sucked, but I think that's the screenwriting, or lack thereof, not the Bonds.

Granted, Roger Moore is no Connery, but he at least kicked the shit out of Timothy Dalton - who sucked and Remington Steele who bores the crap out of me. Moore was at least Swave.

[Tyrone Slothrop]

Originally posted by Alex_de_Large
I would but the Onion has apparently set up a "Premium Service", and we mere mortals can no longer access the archives.

This is by someone who has spent more time thinking about Calvin peeing than is probably healthy. Helpfully, he has a gallery, where I see that Calvin hates lawyers: