LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > The Fashionable

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 368
0 members and 368 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM.
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-30-2004, 03:18 PM   #31
Tyrone Slothrop
Moderasaurus Rex
 
Tyrone Slothrop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,053
Mods are not exempt.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
Tyrone Slothrop is offline  
Old 01-30-2004, 03:18 PM   #32
sgtclub
Serenity Now
 
sgtclub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Survivor Island
Posts: 7,007
Take it to the Bank

NE 23
CAR 13
sgtclub is offline  
Old 01-30-2004, 03:35 PM   #33
Miss Maine
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Patriots 23
Panthers 20



Miss Maine
 
Old 01-30-2004, 04:25 PM   #34
Dave
Might Be Canadian
 
Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Office, door closed.
Posts: 581
Patsies and Kitties

New England 15
Carolina 10
Dave is offline  
Old 01-30-2004, 04:26 PM   #35
Flinty_McFlint
Moderator
 
Flinty_McFlint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: i put on my robe and wizard hat
Posts: 4,837
NE: 23 CA: 14

damn sgt club got my first pick in before me
__________________
I'm going to become rich and famous after I invent a device that allows you to stab people in the face over the internet.
Flinty_McFlint is offline  
Old 01-31-2004, 09:57 PM   #36
Jack Manfred
For the People
 
Jack Manfred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: on the coast
Posts: 1,009
New England: 16
Carolina: 9

... and Vegas rejoices. (The line is still +7 Pats, right?)
__________________
"You're going to miss everything cool and die angry."
Jack Manfred is offline  
Old 02-01-2004, 06:29 PM   #37
lookingformarket
I am beyond a rank!
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 301
Pats 31
Carolina 20
lookingformarket is offline  
Old 02-01-2004, 07:28 PM   #38
Jack Manfred
For the People
 
Jack Manfred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: on the coast
Posts: 1,009
KICKOFF - The Board is Closed

No More Entries.
__________________
"You're going to miss everything cool and die angry."
Jack Manfred is offline  
Old 02-01-2004, 11:32 PM   #39
Shape Shifter
World Ruler
 
Shape Shifter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 12,057
Why is the edit function not working?
__________________
"More than two decades later, it is hard to imagine the Revolutionary War coming out any other way."
Shape Shifter is offline  
Old 02-01-2004, 11:37 PM   #40
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,130
1-0

I'm not sure how this will be judged, but if judged fairly, i've won. thank you.
Hank Chinaski is offline  
Old 02-01-2004, 11:40 PM   #41
leagleaze
I didn't do it.
 
leagleaze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,371
Quote:
Originally posted by Shape Shifter
Why is the edit function not working?
What is it you are trying to edit exactly? The edit function only works for a certain period of time after you post.
leagleaze is offline  
Old 02-01-2004, 11:41 PM   #42
leagleaze
I didn't do it.
 
leagleaze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,371
1-0

Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
I'm not sure how this will be judged, but if judged fairly, i've won. thank you.
I'm judging it by whomever came closest to the score for each team without going over. As per my original post on the issue on Friday. http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...6387#post66387

If that is you, then yes, you've won. I haven't looked through the scores and done the math yet though.

I see it is not you, you went over with the 38.


Last edited by leagleaze; 02-01-2004 at 11:54 PM..
leagleaze is offline  
Old 02-02-2004, 12:27 AM   #43
sgtclub
Serenity Now
 
sgtclub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Survivor Island
Posts: 7,007
1-0

Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
I'm not sure how this will be judged, but if judged fairly, i've won. thank you.
Should have known. Hank always wins.
sgtclub is offline  
Old 02-02-2004, 12:41 AM   #44
pretermitted_child
Underpants Gnomes!
 
pretermitted_child's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 302
1-0

Quote:
Originally posted by leagleaze
I'm judging it by whomever came closest to the score for each team without going over. As per my original post on the issue on Friday. http://www.lawtalkers.com/forums/sho...6387#post66387

If that is you, then yes, you've won. I haven't looked through the scores and done the math yet though.

I see it is not you, you went over with the 38.
Well, Hank, it looks like you've lost.

You mentioned in your post "if judged fairly, i've won," which raises an interesting issue. What does "fairly" mean? Is it the smallest numerical deviation of some sort? If so, how can that be calculated?

The complexity* of this problem is what makes Leagl's approach OK from a fairness standpoint because she has articulated a manageable, bright-line rule.

* If we were to insist on fairness as measured by the numerical accuracy of your guess, one possible algorithm could be the following:

1) Your guess as to which team won must be correct;

2) Take the absolute value of the difference between your guess for the winning team's points and the actual points scored by the winning team;

3) Take the absolute value of the difference between your guess for the losing team's points and the actual points scored by the losing team;

4) Take the absolute value of the difference between your guess for the point difference and the actual point difference;

5) Add the values calculated from (2), (3), and (4). The winning guess would have the smallest total value. (If there is a tie, then I need to figure out another algorithm to take care of a tie fairly.)
pretermitted_child is offline  
Old 02-02-2004, 10:38 AM   #45
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,130
1-0

Quote:
Originally posted by pretermitted_child
Well, Hank, it looks like you've lost.
um....your test would require about $400 in legal time to figure out who wins $25. (edit- actually I think your test is what I did, but without all the expanation, and w/o step 4- of course step 4 isn't necessary.)
If its total number off, then I think Oliver (11 off) won. I tied him, except for the going over rule, which isn't stated anywhere. I mean this isn't this price is right.

Last edited by Hank Chinaski; 02-02-2004 at 10:48 AM..
Hank Chinaski is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:54 PM.