Drive fast, live hard, no regrets... Sorry Penske

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
But I have luscious hair.

I wish. I'd have gotten major fucking ass if I were gay.

You mean youhave lustrous hair. I bet with that hair, and that wedding ring, you could get major ass every day of your life.

Sincerely,

Your Internet Girlfriend.

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by taxwonk
("And if you wre my wife, I'd drink it.")

I'd dip my balls in it!

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally posted by paigowprincess
You mean youhave lustrous hair. I bet with that hair, and that wedding ring, you could get major ass every day of your life.

Sincerely,

Your Internet Girlfriend.

No, I meant lusscious. And I wear no ring.

* Actually, I bought the wrong size. But I do hate rings.

[bold_n_brazen]

Originally posted by paigowprincess
You mean youhave lustrous hair. I bet with that hair, and that wedding ring, you could get major ass every day of your life.

Sincerely,

Your Internet Girlfriend.

On my flow chart, he's rp's internet boyfriend. Do I have this wrong?

Originally posted by taxwonk
Then how did you notice just now? Did you deflate? I just assumed you were referencing the pregnancy-induced stuporous mornings of which NFH spake. If I whiffed, twas unintentional, and I claim the pregnancy ambiguity exception.

("And if you wre my wife, I'd drink it.")

You do better when you have a couple of days to think about a response. Why put yourself under all this unecessary pressure by trying to respond same-day?

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
No, they find a "tick-tock-tick" 30-something wannabe baby machine who's ready to immediately settle down and only needs a new white dress.

That is a terrible thing to say about women.

Besides, the crafty thirty something tick tocker knows how to mantrap a worthier piece of prey.

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
No, I meant lusscious. And I wear no ring.

* Actually, I bought the wrong size. But I do hate rings.

Is Mrs. D joinging us for our rendezvous?

Originally posted by bold_n_brazen
On my flow chart, he's rp's internet boyfriend. Do I have this wrong?

I believe I am mainly correct that SD will mostly agree that yes, you are wrong.

I dont think she is his type anyway.

Originally posted by ironweed
You do better when you have a couple of days to think about a response. Why put yourself under all this unecessary pressure by trying to respond same-day?

"Ping! Pow!

[Replaced_Texan]

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
No, I meant lusscious. And I wear no ring.

* Actually, I bought the wrong size. But I do hate rings.

Too large or too small?

[robustpuppy]

Originally posted by taxwonk
Then how did you notice just now? Did you deflate? I just assumed you were referencing the pregnancy-induced stuporous mornings of which NFH spake. If I whiffed, twas unintentional, and I claim the pregnancy ambiguity exception.

("And if you wre my wife, I'd drink it.")

Next time you have to walk somewhere to get a pastrami sandwich, look down at your feet long enough to take two steps, and see if they look the same as they did in 1985.

[greatwhitenorthchick]

Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Are these guys just shunned from the tribe and left to whittle away their lives in apartments, amidst beer cans, pizza boxes and a wide screen plasma, like Milhouse's Dad?

Milhouse's Dad sleeps in a race car bed. That's something.

[Not Bob]

Originally posted by Replaced_Texan
Too large or too small?

You may be talking about a different kind of ring.

[taxwonk]

Originally posted by ironweed
You do better when you have a couple of days to think about a response. Why put yourself under all this unecessary pressure by trying to respond same-day?

I'm trying to get my posting out of the way early, just in case I get a client this week.

[Replaced_Texan]

Holy shit.

Vatan and I had arranged this weirdly intimate encounter so he could demonstrate the kinky technological offerings from HighJoy.com, his 4-month-old dating site. Unlike other matchmaking sites, High Joy provides forums where singles (or married folk, as the case may be) can chat with each other live, as well as see their partners and hear their partners (if they have an Internet camera and microphone). And if they've purchased one of the male or female versions of the Doc Johnson HighJoy-enabled sex toys, partners can also rotate each other's shafts.

Since Howard Rheingold discussed the field of "teledildonics" in his 1991 book "Virtual Reality" and hypothesized we'd all have "portable telediddlers" by 2020, a plethora of mostly unreliable, clunky Internet sex toys have entered the market. The sensor-packed full-body "Cyber Sex Suit" became a flaccid venture in 2000, when the company couldn't assure the Federal Trade Commission that the suit wouldn't cause heart attacks. Soon afterwards, a sex toy that could be operated by brightening and dimming a computer screen got bland reviews.

The one major success has been the Sinulator, a wireless adaptor that can transform almost any sex toy into one that can be used over the Internet. The Sinulator is user friendly -- it's operated through the Sinulate site, therefore requiring no downloads -- and, aside from the initial cost of the adaptor ($119.95 including two free vibrating bullets that can be inserted into many toys), it's free to use. Sinulators started out being mostly used by companies that train cameras on live "webcam girls"; site visitors are charged extra to manipulate a girl's -- or sometimes guy's -- dildo over the Internet.

HighJoy, however, represents a real shift in teledildonics: It's reaching beyond the realm of late-night porn surfers to a much wider audience. There's not a porn-site ad to be seen on its pages. The site and toys are instead being marketed to a heretofore overlooked population: people who want to have sex with other people in the hopes of possibly founding or furthering a relationship.

Spree: salon.com article