Posting Towards Gomorrah - Page 14

sgtclub · 09-01-2006, 07:22 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Are there other people who like to buy yellowcake even though they don't have nuclear facilities?

There are plenty of explanations for this. For example, given that most of the Iraqi Generals thought they had chemical weapons and were going to use them against the US, it wouldn't surprise me that those seeking the yellowcake thought they had nuke facilities.

Or another example. It seems to me that you need several things to make a nuke (e.g., facility, raw material, technolocy, scientists, etc.). If a country was seeking to have a nuclear program, who says they need to acquire the necessary parts in a given order? More likely, you acquire the stuff (which is hard to get) whenever you have an opportunity to do so and backfill later.

Hank Chinaski · 09-01-2006, 07:35 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
You don't read very well, do you?

What I read, I read very well. Generally someone is paying me to read, I read so well.

Tyrone Slothrop · 09-01-2006, 08:05 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
What I read, I read very well. Generally someone is paying me to read, I read so well.

If you tried reading here, it would be more fun to converse with you.

Sexual Harassment Panda · 09-01-2006, 08:11 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
as a father of a young woman, i find it troubling that the practice of drowning one's date or wife has become socially acceptable.

Tell her I say hello. I'll call her next time I'm in town.

taxwonk · 09-01-2006, 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore
Secondly, as has been established over and over again, not a single crime was committed - other that Libby's perjury. And the perjuy would never had occurred but for Fitzgerald's useless investigation

Yes, I know I'm wonking and someone has already pointed this out, no doubt. So, fuck me.

Change Libby to Clinton and Fitzgerald to Jones and try to explain how you aren't full of shit for one thing or another.

Hank Chinaski · 09-01-2006, 08:38 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
If you tried reading here, it would be more fun to converse with you.

if you evaluated issues honestly it would be more fun to converse with you.

BTW do you know if Panda is a Wonk sock? my daughter is underage, you know.

Penske_Account · 09-01-2006, 08:39 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by taxwonk
Yes, I know I'm wonking and someone has already pointed this out, no doubt. So, fuck me.

Change Libby to Clinton and Fitzgerald to Jones and try to explain how you aren't full of shit for one thing or another.

Libby was an appointed employee. Clinton was elected. His transgressions were far worse because they were a breach of the public trust, as well as a violation of the law. He was the leader of the country, Chief Executive Officer, member of the bar, and yet by his professional behaviour he evidenced he had no respect for the rule of law. The bedrock of our free society (which freedom, the left so obviously hates, hi Ty!)

He degraded and defiled his office.

Not to mention, in the private sector he almost certainly would have been fired relative to L'affaire Lewinsky, et al, for behaviour exposing his organisation to liability for sexual harassment (eg: see Harry Stonecipher).

eta: also not to mention, but for his systematic use of government resources and campaign of intimidation he never would have been elected as he would have been a felon with a conviction for rape on his record.

Penske_Account · 09-01-2006, 08:40 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
if you evaluated issues honestly it would be more fun to converse with you.

BTW do you know if Panda is a Wonk sock? my daughter is underage, you know.

[DELETED FOR OUTABILITY]

:blush:

Tyrone Slothrop · 09-01-2006, 10:09 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
if you evaluated issues honestly it would be more fun to converse with you.

Maybe you could put a little asterix or something in that one post out of twenty.

Hank Chinaski · 09-01-2006, 10:25 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
Maybe you could put a little asterix or something in that one post out of twenty.

if you think that'd help I'd be happy to. but, here's the problem, I don't think you honestly consider whether you've made a point: I think you are just stuck in attack mode. Aren't you unhappy in that box?

Tyrone Slothrop · 09-01-2006, 10:32 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
if you think that'd help I'd be happy to. but, here's the problem, I don't think you honestly consider whether you've made a point: I think you are just stuck in attack mode. Aren't you unhappy in that box?

I'd be happy to have a real conversation with you if I thought you'd put any effort into it for more than a post or -- maybe -- two. But you don't.

I don't hate the playas, but I don't have to like the game.

Hank Chinaski · 09-01-2006, 11:23 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
I'd be happy to have a real conversation with you if I thought you'd put any effort into it for more than a post or -- maybe -- two. But you don't.

I don't hate the playas, but I don't have to like the game.

hmmmmmm

LessinSF · 09-01-2006, 11:40 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
We tax death to disincentivize it. Why do you Republicans want rich people to die?

This is spanky. I have hijacked Less's computer. He is trying to fix me a vodka drink right now but is having trouble finding any ice. But I just had to say that this was a great post. Made me laugh out loud.

LessinSF · 09-01-2006, 11:47 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Penske_Account
The irony is, CA is so consumed with seeking to regain its past glory back from the PacNW, it doesn't even see CT coming, and it will be too late before it does. But, hey, the proles need wine, albeit boxed, too.

Spanky from Less's computer agan. California being worried about CT wine industry would be like the US military worried about Ghana's military. The PacNW is kind of like Norway and Sweden's military.

In the US (actually in the Americas) no one comes close to California wine. That is just a fact that needs to be faced.

Penske_Account · 09-02-2006, 01:24 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by LessinSF
Spanky from Less's computer agan. California being worried about CT wine industry would be like the US military worried about Ghana's military. The PacNW is kind of like Norway and Sweden's military.

In the US (actually in the Americas) no one comes close to California wine. That is just a fact that needs to be faced.

Aaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!! Stop. You're freaking me out dude. Way big tyme.

Anyhoo, celebratory dinner tonight for the anniversary of Saint Penske Jr. (that's outable).

Henriot Brut Sovrain Champagne

2003 Domaine Serene Pinot Noir Evenstad Reserve (sans box, hi Ty!)

I am looking for a domestic sparkler to finish up the night.....stay tuned....