Posting Towards Gomorrah

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by taxwonk
I actually took you off ignore yesterday. I would think the fact that I started responding to your posts after weeks of not doing so would have tipped you off.

Whatever. You do your thing and I'll do my thing.

Exactly. And my posts of last night were applauding the bridge gapping.....don't spoil it now.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
2. several people once contributed more. Where are they? why have they left?

Retired.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Spanky
I think you are all involved in navel gazing. I like the board just the way it is. Sorry if that offends anyone but I find this place fun when I have the time. And don't tell me about the good old days. That is just selective memory. There is one way to tell if the board sucks and that is if people stop posting. People are still posting so what is the problem?

My opinion is if it ain't broke don't fix it. Plus we have all these fun little smileys to play with.

:hug: :violin: :cheers: :band:

2. As usual Spanky, someone of your unique political persuasion, no offence, speaks the truth, and in a tolerant non-biased, multi-cultural manner tinged with classical liberalism. I think certain people should take note. Assuming you are not on ignore.

[Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)]

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
2. several people once contributed more. Where are they? why have they left?

Like the american populace, I'm bored of the war on terror. Discussion of it is even more of a quagmire than the war itself. We need some domestic scandal ("Bush lied!" doesn't count) to reinvigorate things.

BTW, what will the Dems do if they retake the House? Seriously--what's the agenda? What will they attempt to accomplish?

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Like the american populace, I'm bored of the war on terror. Discussion of it is even more of a quagmire than the war itself. We need some domestic scandal ("Bush lied!" doesn't count) to reinvigorate things.

BTW, what will the Dems do if they retake the House? Seriously--what's the agenda?

Hearings and then Articles of Impeachment.

[Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
Hearings and then Articles of Impeachment.

So, you think they're serious about retaking the Senate and WH in 2008?

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
So, you think they're serious about retaking the Senate and WH in 2008?

Do you think "serious" about those two items is better accomplished by Articles of Impeachment? While I think that they would like those two items, I don't think that their strategy is coherent enough to sacrifice the lure of going after Bush in order for the greater good of their donkey party.

[taxwonk]

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
BTW, what will the Dems do if they retake the House? Seriously--what's the agenda? What will they attempt to accomplish?

If they knew, and had the ability to actually get the message out, I might have more faith they could retake the House. As it stands, I'm not holding my breath.

[Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
Do you think "serious" about those two items is better accomplished by Articles of Impeachment?

No, precisely the opposite. But you're probably right about the lack of an agenda.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
No, precisely the opposite. But you're probably right about the lack of an agenda.

While it is lacking, doesn't Impeachment qualify as some type of an agenda?

[Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
While it is lacking, doesn't Impeachment qualify as some type of an agenda?

the politics of personal destruction? certainly keeps the approval ratings high.

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
the politics of personal destruction? certainly keeps the approval ratings high.

Nancy Pelosi also says that the Ds are pro-business. :rofl: :drool:

[Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)]

Originally posted by Penske_Account
Nancy Pelosi also says that the Ds are pro-business. :rofl: :drool:

Given where the R's have been in the House the last few years, her boast may be viable.

[Penske_Account]

When did the "a" change to "u"?

[Penske_Account]

Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Given where the R's have been in the House the last few years, her boast may be viable.

Given where the Ds have been the last 40 plus years that doesn't make me feel any safer.