LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 1,373
0 members and 1,373 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 10-30-2006, 04:20 PM   #11
Spanky
For what it's worth
 
Spanky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: With Thumper
Posts: 6,793
Quote:
Originally posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy
2.

Many of us have nothing against tests, but it's the standardized test and the curriculum focused on beating the test rather than learning the lesson that I find problematic.
If a standardized test simply asks what is six times seven, or even what is value of x, or the deriviative of x, how does "beating the test" not also help the student learn math.

Prior to college, it seems to me, that creating a test that actually test yours knowledge of a subject isn't that hard to do. In other words, preparing for the test will force you to learn the subject.

What sort of tests can you have in elementary school where "beating the test" doesn't also force you to learn the subject?

And why is the California Teachers Association so against testing students? Why do they defend social promotion?
Spanky is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:29 AM.