LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 1,736
0 members and 1,736 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 04-02-2020, 10:04 PM   #11
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,150
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by LessinSF View Post
Not really. Assume people over 70 had the same amount of relevant pre-existing conditions as people under 60. They would then be equally vulnerable and have the same infection and death rates. Accordingly, all that "matters" are the pre-existing conditions, and the only relevant question to anyone of any age would be "do you have heart disease, etc.?" Age may make that more likely, but is ultimately irrelevant to the likelihood of severity of the disease, once the answer to that question is known.
Now go through the same process but substitute “fat, doesn’t exercise, smokes” for old.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:17 AM.